in a web of glass, pinned to the edges of vision

Jeezy Chreezy

colubra

6/16/04 08:30 am

EVEN THE DIPLOMATS hate George W. Bush.
That'd be George W. Bush, the president who seems to have specifically engineered invasion of a non-combatant country. And seems to have a sketchy grasp of detail, when it comes to the difference between 'what I would like' and 'what is'</a>.
George W. Bush, who is potentially clinically insane.

Have I mentioned it's time we elected a sane leader again, Americans?

• 4 comments
• Leave a comment

• agntprovocateur

  6/16/04 08:51 am (UTC)

  

  EVEN THE DIPLOMATS hate George W. Bush.
  
  
  I heard them interviewed on NPR yesterday. I'll like this on my journal too.

  • Reply
  • Thread

• sparkindarkness

  6/16/04 11:45 am (UTC)

  

  How effective will this cricism be? We've had a similar thing hit Blair with some rather high names calling foul, yet he ignored it and kept moving. He's still not listening and still not admitting mistakes were made... and still letting new ones compound the old.
  
  Is Bush & Co any more likely to be reasonable? Ideology driven politics can change their perception of reality too much, and makes it very easy to brush off criticism.

  • Reply
  • Thread

• seismic

  6/16/04 03:38 pm (UTC)

  

  Have I mentioned it's time we elected a sane leader again, Americans?
  
  Once or twice but it bears repeating. Maybe even not necessarily sane, just less insane? Differently insane? Unlikely-to-initiate-armageddon insane?

  • Reply
  • Thread

• fin9901

  6/18/04 01:29 pm (UTC)

  

  Personally, I'd be more surprised if the diplomats came out in favor of Bush. Diplomats, like the State Department, tend to favor stability over freedom in foreign governments.
  

  • Reply
  • Thread